From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Mon Dec 09 12:40:34 2002 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 09 Dec 2002 12:40:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from rlpowell by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 18LUha-0007IR-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 09 Dec 2002 12:40:30 -0800 Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 12:40:30 -0800 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: name of the language Message-ID: <20021209204030.GV6170@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <20021209203139.GT6170@digitalkingdom.org> <20021209153442.Y609-100000@granite.thestonecutters.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20021209153442.Y609-100000@granite.thestonecutters.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i From: Robin Lee Powell X-archive-position: 3350 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 03:35:54PM -0500, Invent Yourself wrote: > On Mon, 9 Dec 2002, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > I think that loglan.org mentioning lojban is *highly* > > innappropriate, as the reverse would be for us. > > A US court decided that the reverse would be completely appropriate > for us. Umm, can you explain that comment? I didn't mean legally appropriate, btw. I meant socially innappropriate, i.e. rude. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. .i le pamoi velru'e zo'u jmaji le plibu taxfu .i le remoi velru'e zo'u mo .i le cimoi velru'e zo'u ba'e prali .uisai http://www.lojban.org/ *** to sa'a cu'u lei pibyta'u cridrnoma toi