From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Tue Dec 10 14:10:20 2002 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 10 Dec 2002 14:10:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from rlpowell by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 18Lsa0-00066X-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 10 Dec 2002 14:10:16 -0800 Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 14:10:16 -0800 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: the ethics of the HTML content meta tag Message-ID: <20021210221016.GA11342@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <20021210185433.GN11342@digitalkingdom.org> <3D16AF20-0C8B-11D7-A99A-000393629ED4@uic.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3D16AF20-0C8B-11D7-A99A-000393629ED4@uic.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i From: Robin Lee Powell X-archive-position: 3418 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 04:03:39PM -0600, Steven Belknap wrote: > On Tuesday, December 10, 2002, at 12:54 PM, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > >I am not interested in discussing this privately. > > Posting a private message to a public listserv is a violation of > netiquette. That's a lovely opinion, but like many of yours lately it is... flawed. In actual point of fact it is not considered a violation of netiquette when the mail was in reply to an on-list post without first asking permission to send private mail. -Robin, who has been on the net for about 12 years now, thankyouverymuch. -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. .i le pamoi velru'e zo'u jmaji le plibu taxfu .i le remoi velru'e zo'u mo .i le cimoi velru'e zo'u ba'e prali .uisai http://www.lojban.org/ *** to sa'a cu'u lei pibyta'u cridrnoma toi