From sbelknap@uic.edu Tue Dec 10 14:27:41 2002
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 10 Dec 2002 14:27:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from larch.cc.uic.edu ([128.248.155.164])
	by digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.05)
	id 18Lsqj-0006Tq-00
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 10 Dec 2002 14:27:33 -0800
Received: (qmail 14575 invoked from network); 10 Dec 2002 22:27:27 -0000
Received: from cis5044.uicomp.uic.edu (HELO uic.edu) (128.248.250.44)
  by larch.cc.uic.edu with SMTP; 10 Dec 2002 22:27:27 -0000
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 16:27:06 -0600
Subject: [lojban] Re: let's get rid of this lojban == loglan crap (was Re: tags)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v548)
Cc: lojban-list@lojban.org
To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
From: Steven Belknap <sbelknap@uic.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20021210185519.GO11342@digitalkingdom.org>
Message-Id: <83AB0CC0-0C8E-11D7-A99A-000393629ED4@uic.edu>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.548)
X-archive-position: 3422
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: sbelknap@uic.edu
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list

On Tuesday, December 10, 2002, at 12:55  PM, Robin Lee Powell wrote:

> On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 01:13:30PM +0200, robin wrote:
>> Adam Raizen wrote:
>>> la djorden. cusku di'e
>>>
>>>> I'm not a LLG member, so I can't official propose this for the next
>>>> meeting (afaik).  However, as a member of the community I would like
>>>> to ask that at the next LLG meeting the "lojban is loglan" statement
>>>> be considered for revokation.
>>>
>>>
>>> There was a very difficult and expensive legal battle fought over
>>> this, and those who participated in it would probably not want their
>>> effort to be nullified, and historically Lojban is related to Loglan,
>>> so at least for those reasons it would probably be difficult to
>>> straight-out revoke the "lojban is loglan" statement. I think that a
>>> clarification is in order, though.
>>>
>>
>> How about something like "Lojban is a variant of Loglan".  Or
>> "development" or whatever.
>
> Sounds good to me.
>
> -Robin

I like John Cowan's better: "lojban is a Loglan."

"Omit needless words!"

-Strunk & White

-Steven