From sbelknap@uic.edu Tue Dec 10 14:32:10 2002
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 10 Dec 2002 14:32:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from larch.cc.uic.edu ([128.248.155.164])
	by digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.05)
	id 18Lsv7-0006Xt-00
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 10 Dec 2002 14:32:05 -0800
Received: (qmail 15267 invoked from network); 10 Dec 2002 22:31:58 -0000
Received: from cis5044.uicomp.uic.edu (HELO uic.edu) (128.248.250.44)
  by larch.cc.uic.edu with SMTP; 10 Dec 2002 22:31:58 -0000
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 16:31:37 -0600
Subject: [lojban] Re: let's get rid of this lojban == loglan crap (was Re: tags)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v548)
Cc: lojban-list@lojban.org
To: xod@thestonecutters.net
From: Steven Belknap <sbelknap@uic.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20021210135837.Q6796-100000@granite.thestonecutters.net>
Message-Id: <255F1EE4-0C8F-11D7-A99A-000393629ED4@uic.edu>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.548)
X-archive-position: 3423
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: sbelknap@uic.edu
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list


On Tuesday, December 10, 2002, at 12:59  PM, Invent Yourself wrote:
>>>>
>>>> There was a very difficult and expensive legal battle fought over
>>>> this, and those who participated in it would probably not want their
>>>> effort to be nullified, and historically Lojban is related to 
>>>> Loglan,
>>>> so at least for those reasons it would probably be difficult to
>>>> straight-out revoke the "lojban is loglan" statement. I think that a
>>>> clarification is in order, though.
>>>>
>>>
>>> How about something like "Lojban is a variant of Loglan".  Or
>>> "development" or whatever.
>>
>> Sounds good to me.
>
>
>
> Or that Lojban is a language in the Lojban family.

If you mean, "Lojban is a language in the Loglan family." That would be 
OK with me.

-Steven