From sentto-44114-18027-1039820751-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Fri Dec 13 15:06:26 2002 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 13 Dec 2002 15:06:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from n20.grp.scd.yahoo.com ([66.218.66.76]) by digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.05) id 18Mysw-0000hK-01 for lojban-in@lojban.org; Fri, 13 Dec 2002 15:06:22 -0800 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-44114-18027-1039820751-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Received: from [66.218.67.199] by n20.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 13 Dec 2002 23:05:51 -0000 X-Sender: raganok@intrex.net X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 13 Dec 2002 23:05:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 29497 invoked from network); 13 Dec 2002 23:05:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m6.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 13 Dec 2002 23:05:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp.intrex.net) (209.42.192.250) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 13 Dec 2002 23:05:50 -0000 Received: from Craig [209.42.200.38] by smtp.intrex.net (SMTPD32-5.05) id A7C19E401F4; Fri, 13 Dec 2002 18:05:37 -0500 To: Message-ID: X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Importance: Normal X-Declude-Sender: raganok@intrex.net [209.42.200.38] X-Note: Total weight is 0. Whitelisted X-eGroups-From: "Craig" From: "Craig" X-Yahoo-Profile: kreig_daniyl MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: list lojban@yahoogroups.com; contact lojban-owner@yahoogroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list lojban@yahoogroups.com Precedence: bulk Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 18:05:38 -0500 Subject: [lojban] Re: Word resolution algorithm so far Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-archive-position: 3538 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: ragnarok@pobox.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list >My preferrence would be to declare "y" next to a vowel >impermissible always, just as "'" next to a consonant. Maybe for a full vowel, but yi and yu ought to be permissible dipthongs, no? >Also, I would prefer to restrict the appearance of "y" next >to "'" to the word ".y'y" and nowhere else. That comes in very handy in cmene, when you want an ' sound. la maiky'elsem uses it, for one example, and I've never seen you complain about that. Out of names and y'y, however, it makes sense to ban it. To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/