From sentto-44114-18099-1040523730-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Sat Dec 21 18:22:45 2002 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sat, 21 Dec 2002 18:22:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from n9.grp.scd.yahoo.com ([66.218.66.93]) by digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.05) id 18PvlJ-00077L-01 for lojban-in@lojban.org; Sat, 21 Dec 2002 18:22:41 -0800 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-44114-18099-1040523730-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Received: from [66.218.67.193] by n9.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 22 Dec 2002 02:22:10 -0000 X-Sender: phma@ixazon.dynip.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 22 Dec 2002 02:22:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 93282 invoked from network); 22 Dec 2002 02:22:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m11.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 22 Dec 2002 02:22:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO neofelis.ixazon.lan) (208.150.110.21) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 22 Dec 2002 02:22:09 -0000 Received: by neofelis.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 500) id D97B83C477; Sat, 21 Dec 2002 21:22:06 -0500 (EST) To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] References: <5.2.0.9.0.20021221054802.00aa48e0@pop.east.cox.net> In-Reply-To: <5.2.0.9.0.20021221054802.00aa48e0@pop.east.cox.net> X-Spamtrap: fesmri@ixazon.dynip.com Message-Id: <0212212121570L.17068@neofelis> From: Pierre Abbat MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: list lojban@yahoogroups.com; contact lojban-owner@yahoogroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list lojban@yahoogroups.com Precedence: bulk Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2002 21:21:57 -0500 Subject: [lojban] Re: speech recognition Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-archive-position: 3611 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: phma@webjockey.net Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Saturday 21 December 2002 05:52, Robert LeChevalier wrote: > At 08:51 PM 12/20/02 -0500, Pierre Abbat wrote: > >/varKIClafLO'i/ is lexed as either an error > > It is an error because no word can have two valid stresses. If there is > secondary stress, it cannot be confuseable with primary stress. I know it *is* an error. The algorithm as stated in BRKWORDS.TXT has ways of ignoring some such errors. This one, as it turns out, it breaks after {varkicla}. > >{varkicla *flo'i} or the correct {varkiclaflo'i} "hovercraft" > > lujvo interpretations always take precedent over an interpretation > including a fu'ivla. {flo'i} is not a fu'ivla, it's a slinku'i. That's why I starred it to show it's an error. phma To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/