From sentto-44114-18105-1040531835-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Sat Dec 21 20:37:50 2002 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sat, 21 Dec 2002 20:37:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from n20.grp.scd.yahoo.com ([66.218.66.76]) by digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.05) id 18Pxs2-0007qT-01 for lojban-in@lojban.org; Sat, 21 Dec 2002 20:37:46 -0800 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-44114-18105-1040531835-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Received: from [66.218.67.199] by n20.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 22 Dec 2002 04:37:16 -0000 X-Sender: phma@ixazon.dynip.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 22 Dec 2002 04:37:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 86107 invoked from network); 22 Dec 2002 04:37:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m6.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 22 Dec 2002 04:37:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO neofelis.ixazon.lan) (208.150.110.21) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 22 Dec 2002 04:37:15 -0000 Received: by neofelis.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 500) id 459933C478; Sat, 21 Dec 2002 23:37:14 -0500 (EST) To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] References: In-Reply-To: X-Spamtrap: fesmri@ixazon.dynip.com Message-Id: <0212212337090Q.17068@neofelis> From: Pierre Abbat MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: list lojban@yahoogroups.com; contact lojban-owner@yahoogroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list lojban@yahoogroups.com Precedence: bulk Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2002 23:37:09 -0500 Subject: [lojban] Re: Lemma and conjecture Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-archive-position: 3617 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: phma@webjockey.net Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Saturday 21 December 2002 22:42, Jorge Llambias wrote: > la pier cusku di'e > >Is it possible for S1 to be a tosmabru of S3, while S4 is a > >slinku'i of S2? > > S1 was the lujvo beginning with CVVRC, so it can't be a > tosmabru of anything. S2 was a corresponding fu'ivla > beginning with CVVKC, which can't be a slinku'i. You have completely missed my point. S1 and S2 begin CVCC, and S3 and S4 are the same words minus the initial CV. If S1, S2, and S3 are, ignoring the tosmabru test, lujvo, while S4 is not, then S2 is valid but S1 is not. phma To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/