From ragnarok@pobox.com Tue Dec 10 18:47:58 2002
Return-Path: <raganok@intrex.net>
X-Sender: raganok@intrex.net
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 11 Dec 2002 02:47:58 -0000
Received: (qmail 79579 invoked from network); 11 Dec 2002 02:47:58 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217)
  by m12.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 11 Dec 2002 02:47:58 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO smtp.intrex.net) (209.42.192.250)
  by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 11 Dec 2002 02:47:57 -0000
Received: from Craig [209.42.200.38] by smtp.intrex.net
  (SMTPD32-5.05) id A759A0501D2; Tue, 10 Dec 2002 21:47:53 -0500
To: <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: RE: [lojban] Re: html tag ethics
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 21:47:55 -0500
Message-ID: <LPBBLNNHBOGBGAINBIEFGEIDCNAA.raganok@intrex.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
In-Reply-To: <E271E0E4-0C90-11D7-A99A-000393629ED4@uic.edu>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
Importance: Normal
X-Declude-Sender: raganok@intrex.net [209.42.200.38]
X-Note: Total weight is 0. Whitelisted
X-eGroups-From: "Craig" <raganok@intrex.net>
From: "Craig" <ragnarok@pobox.com>
Reply-To: <ragnarok@pobox.com>
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=48763382
X-Yahoo-Profile: kreig_daniyl
X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 17913

>to LLG Loglan and that the bizarre (and in my view, disrespectful)
>statement "lojban is Loglan" is found to not be official policy of LLG,

You're the one who has been quoting that to back up calling Lojban "Loglan"
and poach your noble 600 over to this group. Does this reflect a change in
attitude?