From xod@thestonecutters.net Mon Dec 09 12:36:51 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 9 Dec 2002 20:36:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 7469 invoked from network); 9 Dec 2002 20:36:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m11.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 9 Dec 2002 20:36:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 9 Dec 2002 20:36:50 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 18LUe2-00077Y-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Mon, 09 Dec 2002 12:36:50 -0800 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 18LUdt-000771-00; Mon, 09 Dec 2002 12:36:41 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 09 Dec 2002 12:36:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from [66.111.194.10] (helo=granite.thestonecutters.net) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 18LUdf-00073M-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 09 Dec 2002 12:36:27 -0800 Received: from localhost (xod@localhost) by granite.thestonecutters.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gB9KZsl02425 for ; Mon, 9 Dec 2002 15:35:54 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from xod@thestonecutters.net) Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 15:35:54 -0500 (EST) To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: name of the language In-Reply-To: <20021209203139.GT6170@digitalkingdom.org> Message-ID: <20021209153442.Y609-100000@granite.thestonecutters.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-archive-position: 3348 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: xod@thestonecutters.net Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list From: Invent Yourself Reply-To: xod@thestonecutters.net X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=110189215 X-Yahoo-Profile: throwing_back_the_apple X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 17818 On Mon, 9 Dec 2002, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > I think that loglan.org mentioning lojban is *highly* innappropriate, as > the reverse would be for us. A US court decided that the reverse would be completely appropriate for us. -- Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.