From lojban-out@lojban.org Sun Dec 01 22:02:08 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 2 Dec 2002 06:02:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 56101 invoked from network); 2 Dec 2002 06:02:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m11.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 2 Dec 2002 06:02:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 2 Dec 2002 06:02:07 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 18Ijeh-00027S-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Sun, 01 Dec 2002 22:02:07 -0800 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 18Ijea-00022X-00; Sun, 01 Dec 2002 22:02:00 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sun, 01 Dec 2002 22:01:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com ([66.68.125.184] ident=root) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 18IjeT-00022K-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sun, 01 Dec 2002 22:01:53 -0800 Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (asdf@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id gB267fG9034735; Mon, 2 Dec 2002 00:07:41 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from fracture@cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com) Received: (from fracture@localhost) by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id gB267fp4034734; Mon, 2 Dec 2002 00:07:41 -0600 (CST) Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2002 00:07:40 -0600 To: John Cowan Cc: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: Loglan Message-ID: <20021202060740.GA34660@allusion.net> References: <20021202023225.GA31478@allusion.net> <200212020608.BAA16419@mail2.reutershealth.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jRHKVT23PllUwdXP" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200212020608.BAA16419@mail2.reutershealth.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-archive-position: 2866 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: fracture@allusion.net Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list X-eGroups-From: Jordan DeLong From: Jordan DeLong Reply-To: fracture@allusion.net X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 17357 --jRHKVT23PllUwdXP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 12:53:14AM -0500, John Cowan wrote: > Jordan DeLong scripsit: > > Why is a specific toggle cmavo for loglan (which has difficulties > > in terms of parsing mentioned) any better than fu'ivla? {me zoi > > loglan. fooo foo foo .loglan. brodo brodo}, etc, works fine. It's > > what we use for accessing words from other languages.=20 >=20 > Actually that won't work: it means "x1 is an instance of the words > 'fooo foo foo', not their referents. s/zoi/la'o/ You get the idea... --=20 Jordan DeLong - fracture@allusion.net lu zo'o loi censa bakni cu terzba le zaltapla poi xagrai li'u sei la mark. tuen. cusku --jRHKVT23PllUwdXP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline [Attachment content not displayed.] --jRHKVT23PllUwdXP--