From sentto-44114-18103-1040527980-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Sat Dec 21 19:33:35 2002 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sat, 21 Dec 2002 19:33:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from n15.grp.scd.yahoo.com ([66.218.66.70]) by digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.05) id 18Pwrr-0007U8-01 for lojban-in@lojban.org; Sat, 21 Dec 2002 19:33:31 -0800 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-44114-18103-1040527980-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Received: from [66.218.67.199] by n15.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 22 Dec 2002 03:33:00 -0000 X-Sender: phma@ixazon.dynip.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 22 Dec 2002 03:32:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 33382 invoked from network); 22 Dec 2002 03:32:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m6.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 22 Dec 2002 03:32:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO neofelis.ixazon.lan) (208.150.110.21) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 22 Dec 2002 03:32:59 -0000 Received: by neofelis.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 500) id 8C18E3C478; Sat, 21 Dec 2002 22:32:57 -0500 (EST) To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] References: In-Reply-To: X-Spamtrap: fesmri@ixazon.dynip.com Message-Id: <0212212232520P.17068@neofelis> From: Pierre Abbat MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: list lojban@yahoogroups.com; contact lojban-owner@yahoogroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list lojban@yahoogroups.com Precedence: bulk Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2002 22:32:52 -0500 Subject: [lojban] Re: Lemma and conjecture Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-archive-position: 3615 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: phma@webjockey.net Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Saturday 21 December 2002 22:01, Jorge Llambias wrote: > I don't undesrstand what you mean by S3 being related to S1. I mean that S3 is obtained from S1, or vice versa, by some simple string operation such as removing the first syllaboid or adding {pa} to the beginning. > Maybe I misunderstood the conjecture. What I understood is that > if you have two lerpoi that have the same pattern of vowels, > consonants and clusters, then either the two are valid brivla > or the two are invalid brivla. Isn't that the conjecture? That > is what I showed to be true. You showed that to be true for lerpoi beginning CVV. There are still CVC and CCV to consider. Is it possible for S1 to be a tosmabru of S3, while S4 is a slinku'i of S2? phma ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Rent DVDs Online-No late fees! Try Netflix for FREE! http://us.click.yahoo.com/XfSp7B/XlOFAA/46VHAA/GSaulB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/