Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2002 11:10:02 -0600
Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Loglan
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v548)
Cc: <lojban@yahoogroups.com>
To: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <LPBBJKMNINKHACNDIIGMKECLHAAA.a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
Message-Id: <0FAAAA3B-06E2-11D7-BAFA-000393629ED4@uic.edu>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Steven Belknap <sbelknap@UIC.EDU>
Content-Length: 1104
Lines: 29

On Monday, December 2, 2002, at 07:22  PM, And Rosta wrote:

> I would have thought that if the following motion was put forward
> it would pass:
>
> We should contact TLI asking if they would assist us in contacting
> the wider TLI membership to say "Despite the pain and acrimony
> of the Lojban split, we believe that Lojban embodies the key
> aims and principles of JCB and Loglan. Nowadays, Lojban has a
> thriving community of users, while TLI Loglan appears to be
> dormant and to have no likely prospects for revival. We would
> like to cordially invite you to join the Lojban community and
> to come and let us know what we can do to make you welcome and
> to make the transition easier. Your presence among us would be
> a valuable step towards the reunification of the Loglan community.
> This invitation is unconditional, and joining the Lojban
> community would not place you under any obligation."
>
> If something like that was put forward to the members meeting
> for ratification, do you think that would satisfy your concerns?
>
> --And.

Yes, that sounds great.

-Steven