From lojban-out@lojban.org Sat Dec 07 12:01:27 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 7 Dec 2002 20:01:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 62403 invoked from network); 7 Dec 2002 20:01:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m14.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 7 Dec 2002 20:01:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 7 Dec 2002 20:01:27 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 18Kl8h-0007Le-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Sat, 07 Dec 2002 12:01:27 -0800 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 18Kl8a-0007LL-00; Sat, 07 Dec 2002 12:01:20 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sat, 07 Dec 2002 12:01:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.intrex.net ([209.42.192.250]) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 18Kl8V-0007LA-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sat, 07 Dec 2002 12:01:16 -0800 Received: from Craig [209.42.200.12] by smtp.intrex.net (SMTPD32-5.05) id A390A610134; Sat, 07 Dec 2002 15:01:20 -0500 To: Subject: [lojban] Re: Loglan Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2002 15:01:10 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <0541A4B9-088A-11D7-A3CE-00039362FD2A@macsrule.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Importance: Normal X-Declude-Sender: raganok@intrex.net [209.42.200.12] X-Note: Total weight is 0. Whitelisted X-archive-position: 3228 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: raganok@intrex.net Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list X-eGroups-From: "Craig" From: "Craig" Reply-To: raganok@intrex.net X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 17696 >>>>> McIvor is not on the BPFK, is he? Why not invite him? >>>> >>>> Bob expressly wants to invite him. I didn't, and if he is invited, >>>> as far as I'm concerned, he's invited as a Lojbanist (or at the >>>> least, as someone with expertise in Logical Language), not as a >>>> Loglanist. >> >>> I received an informal invitation to participate, but having read >>> all the correspondence to this point, I see no point in doing so. >> >> I must say, I am extremely dissappointed. Not that anyone chooses not >> to be >> on the bypyfyk, but that we have driven away a person who has >> expressed some >> interest in the language. > I have not been driven away. The point is, that given Nick's agenda >and the expressed desires of the majority, I do not think I have >anything worthwhile >to contribute to the meeting. I had misinterpreted your mail. This clarification comes as a relief; even one instance of the jboste driving away anyone with any interest would be troubling to me.