Return-Path: X-Sender: jjllambias@hotmail.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 13 Dec 2002 23:40:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 71134 invoked from network); 13 Dec 2002 23:40:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m5.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 13 Dec 2002 23:40:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hotmail.com) (216.33.241.195) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 13 Dec 2002 23:40:31 -0000 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Fri, 13 Dec 2002 15:40:30 -0800 Received: from 200.69.2.52 by lw8fd.law8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Fri, 13 Dec 2002 23:40:30 GMT To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Bcc: Subject: RE: [lojban] Word resolution algorithm so far Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 23:40:30 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Dec 2002 23:40:30.0945 (UTC) FILETIME=[05EC1D10:01C2A301] From: "Jorge Llambias" X-Originating-IP: [200.69.2.52] X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=6071566 X-Yahoo-Profile: jjllambias2000 X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 18008 Content-Length: 883 Lines: 28 la kreig cusku di'e >I don't want to rehash this on the list, but: > >How would you lojbanize "Timothy"? "timotis" is clearly wrong - [T] is not >a >stop, and it is possible to use "timo'is", which can be pronounced with the >correct fricative. I would lojbanize it as "timotis". A lojban name is not supposed to sound exactly like the original does anyway, it can't. "timo'is" will be pronounced by most people with an "h", it will be pronounced as "th" only by those who use that pronunciation in other words, of course. Similarly, "maiky'elsem" will be pronounced with "th" by those who use that pronunciation. Using "h" for some words and "th" for others would be strange. mu'o mi'e xorxes _________________________________________________________________ STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail