From lojban-out@lojban.org Mon Dec 09 13:43:53 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 9 Dec 2002 21:43:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 22748 invoked from network); 9 Dec 2002 21:43:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m10.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 9 Dec 2002 21:43:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 9 Dec 2002 21:43:52 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 18LVgu-0008Hk-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Mon, 09 Dec 2002 13:43:52 -0800 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 18LVgp-0008HC-00; Mon, 09 Dec 2002 13:43:47 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 09 Dec 2002 13:43:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from rlpowell by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 18LVgj-0008H1-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 09 Dec 2002 13:43:41 -0800 Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 13:43:41 -0800 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: the ethics of the HTML content meta tag Message-ID: <20021209214341.GY6170@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <3E0402F0@webmail.uic.edu> <20021209212736.GX6170@digitalkingdom.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20021209212736.GX6170@digitalkingdom.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-archive-position: 3355 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell From: Robin Lee Powell Reply-To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 17825 On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 01:27:36PM -0800, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 03:08:33PM -0600, sbelknap wrote: > > It is absolutely not rude to include relevant keywords in the meta > > content tag field! > > > > To the contrary, it is rude (and stupid) to *not* include relevant > > keywords. The Loglan site does *not* violate any ethical principle > > here. > > Let me make myself more clear: > > If you search google on 'lojban', the first hit that comes up for a > loglan site is around #60 or so. And it's not much of a loglan site. > Essentially, loglan doesn't come up at all. > > If you search google on 'loglan' the *thirteeth* *hit* is a page that is > actually *on* the lojban.org site. One more thing: http://searchenginewatch.com/sereport/02/10-meta.html -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. .i le pamoi velru'e zo'u jmaji le plibu taxfu .i le remoi velru'e zo'u mo .i le cimoi velru'e zo'u ba'e prali .uisai http://www.lojban.org/ *** to sa'a cu'u lei pibyta'u cridrnoma toi