From sbelknap@UIC.EDU Mon Dec 09 15:58:24 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 9 Dec 2002 23:58:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 79059 invoked from network); 9 Dec 2002 23:58:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m11.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 9 Dec 2002 23:58:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 9 Dec 2002 23:58:23 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 18LXn5-0002gJ-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Mon, 09 Dec 2002 15:58:23 -0800 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 18LXn0-0002g0-00; Mon, 09 Dec 2002 15:58:18 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 09 Dec 2002 15:58:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from larch.cc.uic.edu ([128.248.155.164]) by digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.05) id 18LXmu-0002fr-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 09 Dec 2002 15:58:12 -0800 Received: (qmail 10632 invoked from network); 9 Dec 2002 23:58:04 -0000 Received: from webmail.cc.uic.edu (HELO webmail.uic.edu) (128.248.121.50) by larch.cc.uic.edu with SMTP; 9 Dec 2002 23:58:04 -0000 X-WebMail-UserID: sbelknap@uic.edu Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 17:57:22 -0600 To: lojban-list@lojban.org X-EXP32-SerialNo: 50000146 Subject: [lojban] html tag ethics Message-ID: <3E04BB7A@webmail.uic.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-Mailer: InterChange (Hydra) SMTP v3.62 X-archive-position: 3361 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: sbelknap@uic.edu Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list From: sbelknap Reply-To: sbelknap@uic.edu X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=810567 X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 17832 On Monday, December 9, 2002, at 03:53 PM, Craig wrote: http://www.searchengineethics.com/seoethics.htm To quote: "Methodologies which are treated as bad practices by the search engines => stuffing the content of the web pages with the keywords You know that the content meta tag is not the same as the content of the web pages, right? => using keywords in the title tag which is not related to the page content Loglan is the English word for lojban, just as French is the English word for la francais => using keywords in the meta description tag which is not related to the page content" Loglan is certainly "related" to lojban. Some people say lojban *is* Loglan. (I think they are different words in different languages for the same thing.) -Steven