From xod@thestonecutters.net Fri Dec 06 16:57:02 2002 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_0); 7 Dec 2002 00:57:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 90278 invoked from network); 7 Dec 2002 00:57:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m9.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 7 Dec 2002 00:57:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 7 Dec 2002 00:57:01 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.05) id 18KTHB-0005Ub-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Fri, 06 Dec 2002 16:57:01 -0800 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 18KTH9-0005UI-00; Fri, 06 Dec 2002 16:56:59 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 06 Dec 2002 16:56:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from [66.111.194.10] (helo=granite.thestonecutters.net) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05) id 18KTH3-0005RK-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 06 Dec 2002 16:56:53 -0800 Received: from localhost (xod@localhost) by granite.thestonecutters.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gB70uOU86476 for ; Fri, 6 Dec 2002 19:56:24 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from xod@thestonecutters.net) Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2002 19:56:24 -0500 (EST) To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: cmegadri valfendi preti In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20021206195506.O85943-100000@granite.thestonecutters.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-archive-position: 3183 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: xod@thestonecutters.net Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list From: Invent Yourself Reply-To: xod@thestonecutters.net X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=110189215 X-Yahoo-Profile: throwing_back_the_apple X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 17662 On Sat, 7 Dec 2002, And Rosta wrote: > Do you think so? Personally, I don't think I am capable of parsing > the phonological string without the aid of pragmatics (i.e. knowing > in advance what it is that you are likely to be saying). I can assure you that pragmatics provides most of the understanding in actual Lojban conversation. -- Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.