From phma@ixazon.dynip.com Sat Jan 11 17:21:47 2003
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sat, 11 Jan 2003 17:21:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 208-150-110-21-adsl.precisionet.net ([208.150.110.21] helo=blackcat.ixazon.lan)
	by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
	id 18XWon-0006BR-00
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sat, 11 Jan 2003 17:21:42 -0800
Received: by blackcat.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id 5672883E6; Sun, 12 Jan 2003 01:21:13 +0000 (UTC)
From: Pierre Abbat <phma@webjockey.net>
Organization: dis
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] kernauke krecau mlatu
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2003 20:21:13 -0500
User-Agent: KMail/1.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200301112021.13207.phma@webjockey.net>
X-archive-position: 3777
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: phma@webjockey.net
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list

A friend of mine has a Cornish Rex cat. Cornish Rexes aren't bald, but they do 
lack hair, having only the short underfur. So is it appropriate to call them 
{kernauke krecau}? What about the Devon Rex, the Sphynx (which is bald), and 
the Selkirk Rex (which doesn't lack hair, but has tightly curled hair)?

phma