From jexom@free.fr Wed Feb 19 08:05:17 2003
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 19 Feb 2003 08:05:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from postfix3-1.free.fr ([213.228.0.44])
	by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
	id 18lWie-0002k3-00
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 19 Feb 2003 08:05:12 -0800
Received: from imp1-1.free.fr (imp1-1.free.fr [213.228.0.21])
	by postfix3-1.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09A46C128
	for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Wed, 19 Feb 2003 17:05:11 +0100 (CET)
Received: by imp1-1.free.fr (Postfix, from userid 33)
	id B942D64078; Wed, 19 Feb 2003 17:05:10 +0100 (CET)
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] skiji
Message-ID: <1045670709.3e53ab3584b6a@imp.free.fr>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 17:05:09 +0100 (CET)
From: "jexOm." <jexom@free.fr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
User-Agent: IMP/PHP IMAP webmail program 2.2.6
X-Originating-IP: 130.213.141.245
X-archive-position: 4101
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: jexom@free.fr
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list

coi. rodo .i mi'e jexOm.

Do you understand the following?

{.i le nu mi pu klama le cmana poi se cmene zo .alp. tezu'e mi te skiji loi snime}

Would there be a better way of saying it?
For example, would {le la .alp. cmana} be better than {le cmana poi se cmene zo
.alp.}?
Is {loi} appropriate for {snime} here?
Is the construction {le nu ... tezu'e ...} correct for saying "I have done this
for/in_order_to do that"?

Any help/comment is welcome,

ki'e co'o mu'o