From phma@webjockey.net Fri Feb 07 13:55:25 2003 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_3_4); 7 Feb 2003 21:55:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 98101 invoked from network); 7 Feb 2003 21:55:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m6.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 7 Feb 2003 21:55:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 7 Feb 2003 21:55:25 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12) id 18hGSy-0000kV-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Fri, 07 Feb 2003 13:55:24 -0800 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 18hGSn-0000jp-00; Fri, 07 Feb 2003 13:55:13 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 07 Feb 2003 13:55:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from 208-150-110-21-adsl.precisionet.net ([208.150.110.21] helo=blackcat.ixazon.lan) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 18hGSh-0000jd-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 07 Feb 2003 13:55:07 -0800 Received: by blackcat.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 91D0129B3; Fri, 7 Feb 2003 21:54:44 +0000 (UTC) Organization: dis To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: Language Names, please. Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 16:54:44 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 References: <20030205220821.GJ13069@digitalkingdom.org> <200302052001.01080.phma@webjockey.net> <20030206190148.GF16074@digitalkingdom.org> In-Reply-To: <20030206190148.GF16074@digitalkingdom.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200302071654.44157.phma@webjockey.net> X-archive-position: 4052 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: phma@webjockey.net Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list From: Pierre Abbat Reply-To: phma@webjockey.net X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=92712300 X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 18517 On Thursday 06 February 2003 14:01, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 08:01:00PM -0500, Pierre Abbat wrote: > > kymraig. I don't think Welsh should have a gismu, and I'm not sure what > > to do about the 'y' when making a brivla, but there should be a brivla so > > that we can speak about a Welsh broda. > > I really need a brivla in this case. Comments, anyone? I thought of {kamraigo}, but that breaks up, but {mraigo} is of the official experimental rafsi fu'ivla form. If not {mraigo}, {bangrkamri}. phma