From phma@ixazon.dynip.com Sat Mar 15 16:25:39 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sat, 15 Mar 2003 16:25:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from 208-150-110-21-adsl.precisionet.net ([208.150.110.21] helo=blackcat.ixazon.lan) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 18uLy1-000419-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sat, 15 Mar 2003 16:25:33 -0800 Received: by blackcat.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 685CE3B0B; Sun, 16 Mar 2003 00:25:32 +0000 (UTC) From: Pierre Abbat Organization: dis To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Format for definitions of plants/animals in Lojban Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2003 19:25:32 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200303151925.32159.phma@webjockey.net> X-archive-position: 4535 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: phma@webjockey.net Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list I defined {mango} as follows: x1 noi grute ja tricu la'o ly. Mangifera .ly. cu spatrnakardiace x2 The x2 of {mango} is the same as the x2 of {tricu} or {grute} or {spatrnakardiace}, except that it is restricted to the genus Mangifera or species thereof. Is that a good way to word it? How else could it be worded? phma -- .i toljundi do .ibabo mi'afra tu'a do .ibabo damba do .ibabo do jinga