From lojban-out@lojban.org Thu Mar 13 10:17:16 2003 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_6_1); 13 Mar 2003 18:17:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 23458 invoked from network); 13 Mar 2003 18:17:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m7.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 13 Mar 2003 18:17:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 13 Mar 2003 18:17:15 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12) id 18tXGV-0008BC-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Thu, 13 Mar 2003 10:17:15 -0800 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 18tXGE-0008Ad-00; Thu, 13 Mar 2003 10:16:58 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 13 Mar 2003 10:16:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from rlpowell by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12) id 18tXG7-0008AS-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 13 Mar 2003 10:16:51 -0800 Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 10:16:51 -0800 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: spofu skami Message-ID: <20030313181651.GD25165@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <20030313180301.GB25165@digitalkingdom.org> <20030313130903.H85179-100000@granite.thestonecutters.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030313130903.H85179-100000@granite.thestonecutters.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i X-archive-position: 4468 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell From: Robin Lee Powell Reply-To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 18935 On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 01:12:17PM -0500, Invent Yourself wrote: > On Thu, 13 Mar 2003, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 09:57:03AM -0500, Invent Yourself wrote: > > > It is part of the basic definition. The definition is not "nerve"; > > > that's a logflash mnemonic. > > > > x1 is a nerve/neuron [body-part] of x2 > > > > Note the words 'nerve', 'neuron', and 'body-part'. Perhaps you're > > talking about a different definition? > > You know what I'm talking about. Pretend I've explained myself. Umm, no, I don't. IIRC we've discussed this before, and I threw my hands up in frustration because I couldn't understand what the hell you were trying to say. The x1 of nirna is clearly a neuron. The x2 is the body containing the neuron. I have no idea how one could possibly have any reasonable argument against that point. Here's the full definition: nirna nir nerve x1 is a nerve/neuron [body-part] of x2; [metaphor: information/control network connection] [also (adjective:) x1 is neural]; (cf. ve benji) Note the cf. to "ve benji", which seems like it might do what you want. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. .i le pamoi velru'e zo'u crepu le plibu taxfu .i le remoi velru'e zo'u mo .i le cimoi velru'e zo'u ba'e prali .uisai http://www.lojban.org/ *** to sa'a cu'u lei pibyta'u cridrnoma toi