From lojban-out@lojban.org Sat Mar 22 22:50:11 2003 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_6_5); 23 Mar 2003 06:50:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 88279 invoked from network); 23 Mar 2003 06:50:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m8.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 23 Mar 2003 06:50:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 23 Mar 2003 06:50:09 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12) id 18wzJ3-0001sQ-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Sat, 22 Mar 2003 22:50:09 -0800 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 18wzIt-0001rw-00; Sat, 22 Mar 2003 22:49:59 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sat, 22 Mar 2003 22:49:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from rlpowell by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12) id 18wzIi-0001rX-00; Sat, 22 Mar 2003 22:49:48 -0800 Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2003 22:49:48 -0800 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: [ADMIN] Closed list. Message-ID: <20030323064948.GD3444@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <20030323050707.GC3444@digitalkingdom.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i X-archive-position: 4591 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell From: Robin Lee Powell Reply-To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 19058 On Sun, Mar 23, 2003 at 01:35:38AM -0500, John Cowan wrote: > Robin Lee Powell scripsit: > > The lojban.org lojban-list mirror is now closed to posting from > > non-members, due to spam. > > Good. > > > Also, I've found a way to restrict the archives to members only, and > > I'll see what I can do about getting that implemented soon. > > Not so good. I think it's important that lojban archives continue to > be generally accessible. Heh. Well, certainly easier for me > If you want to have a gimmick to mask email addresses in them, that's > fine with me. I think that I'm going to just put the whole issue to the members at the next meeting. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. .i le pamoi velru'e zo'u crepu le plibu taxfu .i le remoi velru'e zo'u mo .i le cimoi velru'e zo'u ba'e prali .uisai http://www.lojban.org/ *** to sa'a cu'u lei pibyta'u cridrnoma toi