From ragnarok@pobox.com Fri Apr 18 15:31:00 2003
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 18 Apr 2003 15:31:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.intrex.net ([209.42.192.250])
	by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
	id 196eNi-0001yk-00
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 18 Apr 2003 15:30:54 -0700
Received: from craig [209.42.200.60] by smtp.intrex.net
  (SMTPD32-7.13) id AC8373EC006E; Fri, 18 Apr 2003 18:30:27 -0400
From: "Craig" <ragnarok@pobox.com>
To: <lojban-list@lojban.org>
Subject: [lojban] Re: ynai
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2003 18:30:24 -0400
Message-ID: <LPBBLNNHBOGBGAINBIEFGEICDDAA.ragnarok@pobox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
In-Reply-To: <3EA0DCFD.8080803@bilkent.edu.tr>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
Importance: Normal
X-Declude-Sender: ragnarok@pobox.com [209.42.200.60]
X-archive-position: 4844
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: ragnarok@pobox.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list

>".y" is in selma'o Y, not UI - can it really be negated?

Y shouldn't be negatable. Y is not negatable in actual usage. The Book does
not mention Y being negatable. Jbofi'e thinks Y is negatable. Jordan tells
me that the BNF disagrees. Hrm, looks like Y is not negatable.