From fracture@cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com Wed Apr 30 19:20:54 2003
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 30 Apr 2003 19:20:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com ([66.68.125.184] ident=root)
	by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
	id 19B3gm-0007lw-00
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 19:20:49 -0700
Received: from cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (asdf@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.6p2/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h412Wlsr018015
	for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 21:32:47 -0500 (CDT)
	(envelope-from fracture@cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com)
Received: (from fracture@localhost)
	by cs6668125-184.austin.rr.com (8.12.6p2/8.12.3/Submit) id h412WkSN018014
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 21:32:46 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 21:32:46 -0500
From: Jordan DeLong <fracture@allusion.net>
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: Lujvo frequency list
Message-ID: <20030501023246.GA17923@allusion.net>
References: <20030430024227.GA13634@mit.edu> <20030430164114.GT20953@digitalkingdom.org> <20030430180844.GA6200@mit.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20030430180844.GA6200@mit.edu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i
X-archive-position: 5079
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: fracture@allusion.net
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list


--VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Apr 30, 2003 at 02:08:44PM -0400, Rob Speer wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2003 at 09:41:15AM -0700, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> > That's odd, since I for one consistently use djisku, on the grounds
> > that the appropriate tanru is djica cusku, as in "xu do djica cusku
> > lu mi na klama li'u".
>=20
> For the tanru, you want the base word to be {djica}, because "want to
> say" is a type of want more than it is an act of saying. But you want
> the place structure of cusku. As a tanru it would best be {cusku co
> djica}; as a lujvo, the place structure falls nicely into place for
> {skudji}.
>=20
> The fully expanded version is of course {djica le nu cusku}, but
> generally {djica le nu broda} gets tanru-ized as {broda djica}.

Actually "djica tu'a lo nu cusku".

--=20
Jordan DeLong - fracture@allusion.net
lu zo'o loi censa bakni cu terzba le zaltapla poi xagrai li'u
                                     sei la mark. tuen. cusku

--VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE+sIdODrrilS51AZ8RAh2AAJ4wWkVHlqnW6uOSPoIC8v8bHjgPHwCdHI25
RfeXrHti6TDBS44C1OaaH1s=
=Xm/k
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb--