From phma@webjockey.net Wed Apr 30 15:24:46 2003
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_6_6); 30 Apr 2003 22:24:46 -0000
Received: (qmail 67744 invoked from network); 30 Apr 2003 22:24:45 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216)
  by m14.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 30 Apr 2003 22:24:45 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175)
  by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 30 Apr 2003 22:24:44 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12)
	id 19B00K-0005eX-00
	for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 15:24:44 -0700
Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain)
	by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
	id 19Azzx-0005e2-00; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 15:24:21 -0700
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 30 Apr 2003 15:24:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 208-150-110-21-adsl.precisionet.net ([208.150.110.21] helo=blackcat.ixazon.lan)
	by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
	id 19Azzp-0005dq-00
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 15:24:13 -0700
Received: by blackcat.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id A5FEF3E95; Wed, 30 Apr 2003 18:23:50 -0400 (EDT)
Organization: dis
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: BPFK phpbb
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 18:23:50 -0400
User-Agent: KMail/1.5
References: <5.2.0.9.0.20030430074415.03f0a350@pop.east.cox.net> <5.2.0.9.0.20030430122931.03758840@pop.east.cox.net>
In-Reply-To: <5.2.0.9.0.20030430122931.03758840@pop.east.cox.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200304301823.50004.phma@webjockey.net>
X-archive-position: 5067
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: phma@webjockey.net
Precedence: bulk
X-list: lojban-list
From: Pierre Abbat <phma@webjockey.net>
Reply-To: phma@webjockey.net
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=92712300
X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 19546

On Wednesday 30 April 2003 12:38, Robert LeChevalier wrote:
> At 05:54 AM 4/30/03 -0700, bancus wrote:
> [unquotable due to GPG]
>
> dakau means exactly the same as makau, and was originally what we used.
> mikau means the same thing with the suggestion that "mi" is the value.

To me, {mi djuno ledu'u dakau klama le zarci} implies that someone went to the 
store, whereas {mi djuno ledu'u makau klama le zarci} doesn't. If the main 
verb is {senpi}, I doubt I can tell what the distinction is.

phma