From jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Tue Apr 29 09:23:16 2003 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_6_6); 29 Apr 2003 16:23:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 75110 invoked from network); 29 Apr 2003 16:23:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m15.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 29 Apr 2003 16:23:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 29 Apr 2003 16:23:15 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12) id 19AXsx-0008M5-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 09:23:15 -0700 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19AXsn-0008LW-00; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 09:23:05 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 29 Apr 2003 09:23:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from web20503.mail.yahoo.com ([216.136.226.138]) by digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 19AXsT-0008KJ-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 09:22:45 -0700 Message-ID: <20030429162242.4036.qmail@web20503.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [200.49.74.2] by web20503.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 09:22:42 PDT Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 09:22:42 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [lojban] Re: BPFK phpbb To: lojban-list@lojban.org In-Reply-To: <20030429161736.GA6283@allusion.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-archive-position: 5013 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list From: Jorge "Llambías" Reply-To: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=142311107 X-Yahoo-Profile: jjllambias2000 X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 19491 la djorden cusku di'e > Ok how about fi'o nai: > mi fi'onai klama le broda cu barda Probably {fi'onai klama} = {ka'anai}, whatever that is. > Or xinai: > mi xinai pa klama That could indicate a superindex. > Or even better, nanai: > mi nanai klama Clearly {nanai} = {ja'a}. > ni'onai nanai kunai lenai nanmu po'unainai lanai xorxes. zo'unai > rinai nanai jinvi lenai du'unai ronai cmavo penainai la'onai zo nai > nai cu to'enai xamgu bonai na'enai plukytce .inai .u'inai > > Explain each of those nai usages? {ni'onai} could be {no'i}, or some other paragraph indicator. {po'unainai} = {po'u} {zo'unai} = {zo'u naku} {to'enai} and {na'enai} are similar to {je'a}, each with a different nuance. The others have already been discussed (some of them are already grammatical). > I think it's been pretty well demonstrated that nai is not a word > that makes sense to be used anywhere, so I'm done. I think I've shown it does make sense pretty much everywhere. mu'o mi'e xorxes __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. http://search.yahoo.com