Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_6_6); 30 Apr 2003 00:03:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 6894 invoked from network); 30 Apr 2003 00:03:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m13.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 30 Apr 2003 00:03:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 30 Apr 2003 00:03:36 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12) id 19Af4R-0002vL-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 17:03:35 -0700 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19Af4G-0002um-00; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 17:03:24 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 29 Apr 2003 17:03:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rlpowell by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12) id 19Af3x-0002uE-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 17:03:05 -0700 Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 17:03:05 -0700 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: nai in UI (was: BPFK phpbb) Message-ID: <20030430000305.GR20953@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <20030429143319.GA5227@allusion.net> <20030429161151.54722.qmail@web20511.mail.yahoo.com> <20030429162617.GH20953@digitalkingdom.org> <20030429235833.GE12348@ccil.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030429235833.GE12348@ccil.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i X-archive-position: 5023 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell From: Robin Lee Powell Reply-To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 19500 Content-Length: 1209 Lines: 43 On Tue, Apr 29, 2003 at 07:58:33PM -0400, John Cowan wrote: > Robin Lee Powell scripsit: > > > For the same reason you can't say "pu bai klama": LALR(1). If > > you haven't gotten used to doing "pu je bai klama", you either > > are new, or aren't interested in doing proper formal lojban > > anyways. > > Actually "pu bai klama" is fine: it's "pu [ku] bai klama". The > rules about tenses are really pretty nugatory: if you violate > them, the parser will just insert ku's anyhow. So that would be a bug in jbofi'e, then? mi pu bai klama -------------------- SYNTAX ERROR IN TEXT -------------------- Misparsed token : klama [BRIVLA] (line 1, col 11) Latest successfully parsed tokens : bai [BAI] (line 1, col 7) MARKER : PRIVATE_START_BAI pu [PU] (line 1, col 4) mi [KOhA3] (line 1, col 1) -------------------- > Furthermore, the tense part of the grammar is not at all LALR(1). Oh. What is it, then? -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. .i le pamoi velru'e zo'u crepu le plibu taxfu .i le remoi velru'e zo'u mo .i le cimoi velru'e zo'u ba'e prali .uisai http://www.lojban.org/ *** to sa'a cu'u lei pibyta'u cridrnoma toi