From lojban-out@lojban.org Tue Apr 29 03:39:52 2003 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_6_6); 29 Apr 2003 10:39:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 73033 invoked from network); 29 Apr 2003 10:39:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m4.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 29 Apr 2003 10:39:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 29 Apr 2003 10:39:51 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12) id 19ASWc-0002So-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 03:39:50 -0700 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19ASUS-0002S2-00; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 03:37:36 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 29 Apr 2003 03:37:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ca-ontario-cmts7d-79.anhmca.adelphia.net ([68.170.46.79] helo=ben ident=mail) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19ASSE-0002R6-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 03:35:18 -0700 Received: from rizen by ben with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 19ASSA-0008HX-00 for ; Tue, 29 Apr 2003 03:35:14 -0700 Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 03:35:14 -0700 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: nai in UI (was: BPFK phpbb) Message-Id: <20030429033514.76205c83.rizen@surreality.us> In-Reply-To: <5.2.0.9.0.20030428212900.0390d0b0@pop.east.cox.net> References: <20030428205116.GH22216@digitalkingdom.org> <5.2.0.9.0.20030428212900.0390d0b0@pop.east.cox.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.11 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-debian-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; boundary="=.qEb))MSve)ad'M" X-archive-position: 5002 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rizen@surreality.us Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list X-eGroups-From: Theodore Reed (bancus) From: Theodore Reed (bancus) Reply-To: rizen@surreality.us X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 19480 --=.qEb))MSve)ad'M Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 28 Apr 2003 21:37:08 -0400 Robert LeChevalier wrote: > >This topic was inspired by Holy Usage, not pure abstract > >tinkering. > > It was inspired by jboske-ist habits, and people forgetting that the > byfy is NOT jboske. Well, to be fair, I'm no a jboskepre, but I have occaisionally written ka'enai by accident. (Simply not realizing that nai can't go there, even though it seems like it should.) Does this justify a language change? Probably not. (Although I must say that aestetically (probably misspelled that), ka'enai sounds much nicer than na'eka'e.) -- mu'o mi'e la'o gy. Theodore Reed gy. .e la bancus. to zoi gy. http://surreality.us/lojban/ gy. mi nelmau lo notci poi mifra fi la pygypys. --=.qEb))MSve)ad'M Content-Type: application/pgp-signature [Attachment content not displayed.] --=.qEb))MSve)ad'M--