From sentto-44114-19617-1052082035-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Sun May 04 14:01:15 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sun, 04 May 2003 14:01:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from n1.grp.scd.yahoo.com ([66.218.66.64]) by digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 19CQba-00070g-01 for lojban-in@lojban.org; Sun, 04 May 2003 14:01:06 -0700 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-44114-19617-1052082035-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Received: from [66.218.67.192] by n1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 04 May 2003 21:00:35 -0000 X-Sender: ragnarok@pobox.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_6_6); 4 May 2003 21:00:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 17494 invoked from network); 4 May 2003 21:00:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m10.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 4 May 2003 21:00:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp.intrex.net) (209.42.192.250) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 4 May 2003 21:00:34 -0000 Received: from craig [209.42.200.60] by smtp.intrex.net (SMTPD32-7.13) id AF7A277B0076; Sun, 04 May 2003 17:00:42 -0400 To: Message-ID: X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <20030504205158.GF28808@ccil.org> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Importance: Normal X-Declude-Sender: ragnarok@pobox.com [209.42.200.60] From: "Craig" X-Yahoo-Profile: kreig_daniyl MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: list lojban@yahoogroups.com; contact lojban-owner@yahoogroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list lojban@yahoogroups.com Precedence: bulk Date: Sun, 4 May 2003 17:00:35 -0400 Subject: [lojban] Re: Some ideas/questions (long) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-archive-position: 5116 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: ragnarok@pobox.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list >Quine shows that if you replace the denotation of all terms systematically >with their complements (so that the term "Oskar" which previously denoted >Oskar now means the-entire-universe-except-Oskar), everything works fine: >all true statements remain true and all false ones false. Umm... That is blue. Everything-in-the-entire-universe-except-that does-everything-except-be every-color-but-blue. Which implies that the universe (except possibly that) is blue, right? ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Access Your PC from Anywhere - Try GoToMyPC Free! http://us.click.yahoo.com/XyvdrB/Uq8FAA/uetFAA/GSaulB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/