From jkominek@miranda.org Mon May 05 15:57:23 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 05 May 2003 15:57:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from miranda.org ([209.58.150.153] ident=qmailr) by digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 19CotW-0002pW-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 05 May 2003 15:57:14 -0700 Received: (qmail 4710 invoked by uid 534); 5 May 2003 22:57:13 -0000 Date: Mon, 5 May 2003 16:57:13 -0600 From: Jay F Kominek To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: semantic space Message-ID: <20030505225713.GN15743@miranda.org> References: <168.1e2ea13d.2be82776@wmconnect.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <168.1e2ea13d.2be82776@wmconnect.com> Accept-Language: art-lojban, en User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-archive-position: 5135 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jkominek@miranda.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Mon, May 05, 2003 at 04:45:42PM -0400, MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com wrote: > John Cowan wrote: > > > >Lojban doesn't really classify relations at all: > > the gismu list is a large and disorderly bag whose merit is that it > > blankets semantic space, > > has this really been demonstrated? How does one demonstrate that? (Or, for starters, measure semantic space?) -- Jay Kominek A UNIX is anything which is subtly incompatible with everything else claiming to be a UNIX.