From ragnarok@pobox.com Wed May 07 03:49:50 2003
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 07 May 2003 03:50:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.intrex.net ([209.42.192.250])
	by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
	id 19DMSI-0003l9-00
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 07 May 2003 03:47:22 -0700
Received: from craig [209.42.200.60] by smtp.intrex.net
  (SMTPD32-7.13) id A41E952029E; Wed, 07 May 2003 06:46:54 -0400
From: "Craig" <ragnarok@pobox.com>
To: <lojban-list@lojban.org>
Subject: [lojban] Re: Browser colours (was: Re: Mongolian-based Lojbanorthography)
Date: Wed, 7 May 2003 06:47:06 -0400
Message-ID: <LPBBLNNHBOGBGAINBIEFMECNDFAA.ragnarok@pobox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <1052300598.4062.12.camel@ludvig.safelogic.se>
X-Declude-Sender: ragnarok@pobox.com [209.42.200.60]
X-archive-position: 5189
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: ragnarok@pobox.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list

>> Also, in response to the claim that the white letters are too glaring, I
>> have changed the style sheets to use a darker shade (#ffffff -> #c8c8c8).

>Well, this made the page even more unreadable :)

Actually, I did see one study that claimed black on beige was the best. To
me that implies that the change may actually help.