From eye_onus@yahoo.com Sat May 17 17:56:06 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sat, 17 May 2003 17:56:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from web10909.mail.yahoo.com ([216.136.131.218]) by digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 19HCSv-0003Zf-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sat, 17 May 2003 17:55:53 -0700 Message-ID: <20030518005553.19505.qmail@web10909.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [132.178.216.206] by web10909.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 17 May 2003 17:55:53 PDT Date: Sat, 17 May 2003 17:55:53 -0700 (PDT) From: Jon MacLeod Subject: [lojban] Re: Alternative Orthography. Yes, another one. To: lojban list In-Reply-To: <20030517042130.GA3216@digitalkingdom.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-archive-position: 5325 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: eye_onus@yahoo.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list > > I think using underlines would work, except in such cases where > > that isn't possible. For example, 'juliet.' for 'JUliet.'. > > Uhh, that's underlined? It was supposed to be 'juliet.', which is the HTML code for underlining. If you had HTML e-mail enabled, you would have seen it. mi'e la ian. ===== "I have a brain, I've just lost my mind." -Ian McLeod -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version 3.1 GSC>$ d+(++) s++:-- a-- C++ UL P L>+++ !E W+(++) N++ o? K- !w--- O- M@ V? PS+++ PE- Y+ PGP- t+ !5 X(+) R+ !tv-- b+++ DI+ D+ G e* h* r-(%) y+ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. http://search.yahoo.com