From jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Thu May 22 13:58:33 2003
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 22 May 2003 13:58:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from web41906.mail.yahoo.com ([66.218.93.157])
	by digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.12)
	id 19Ix8r-0005OK-00
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 22 May 2003 13:58:25 -0700
Message-ID: <20030522205755.71164.qmail@web41906.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [200.49.74.2] by web41906.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 22 May 2003 13:57:55 PDT
Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 13:57:55 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jorge "Llambías" <jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar>
Subject: [lojban] Re: modal connection
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
In-Reply-To: <004101c32094$e53043a0$fe7aa8c0@ONEOF>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-archive-position: 5346
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list

la ctefan cusku di'e

> I was somewhat surprised when I found out that modal connection after
> non-logical connectives (e.g. {fa'uni'ibo} ) is not grammatical according to
> the parser.
> 
> Was this simply forgotten or intended? And if so what was the intention?

It seems to be grammatical according to the EBNF grammar:

statement-2 = statement-3 [I [jek | joik] [stag] BO # [statement-2]] 

sumti-3 = sumti-4 [(ek | joik) [stag] BO # sumti-3] 

selbri-5 = selbri-6 [(jek | joik) [stag] BO # selbri-5] 

operator-1 = [...] | operator-2 (jek | joik) [stag] BO # operator-1 

operand-2 = operand-3 [(ek | joik) [stag] BO # operand-2] 


mu'o mi'e xorxes


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
http://search.yahoo.com