From sentto-44114-19969-1054074350-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Tue May 27 15:26:28 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 27 May 2003 15:26:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from n36.grp.scd.yahoo.com ([66.218.66.104]) by digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 19Kmti-0005tL-00 for lojban-in@lojban.org; Tue, 27 May 2003 15:26:22 -0700 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-44114-19969-1054074350-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Received: from [66.218.66.95] by n36.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 27 May 2003 22:25:51 -0000 X-Sender: a.rosta@lycos.co.uk X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 59186 invoked from network); 27 May 2003 22:25:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m7.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 27 May 2003 22:25:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lmsmtp03.st1.spray.net) (212.78.202.113) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 27 May 2003 22:25:50 -0000 Received: from oemcomputer (host81-7-56-238.surfport24.v21.co.uk [81.7.56.238]) by lmsmtp03.st1.spray.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54CF93CF30 for ; Wed, 28 May 2003 00:25:48 +0200 (MEST) To: Message-ID: X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <20030527050909.GH1511@ccil.org> From: "And Rosta" X-Yahoo-Profile: andjamin MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: list lojban@yahoogroups.com; contact lojban-owner@yahoogroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list lojban@yahoogroups.com Precedence: bulk Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 23:25:47 +0100 Subject: [lojban] Re: Digest Number 1752 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-archive-position: 5467 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: a.rosta@lycos.co.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list John: > Nick Nicholas scripsit: > > > Moreover, any objections (and there have been many) lambast the whole > > of MEX, and MEX cmavo have few defenders. Most prominently you, in > > fact; the only other I can think of who is on record as not minding > > them is Robin.CA. > > I'll go on record as favoring MEX cmavo too Believe it or not, I've never been among those with a big downer on MEX. It's quite neatly circumscribed, easy to ignore, and doesn't interfere with the rest of the language. I class it among the optional extra bells and whistles. Compare this to the disaster area the gadri system currently is -- there's no contest. ==And. ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Get A Free Psychic Reading! Your Online Answer To Life's Important Questions. http://us.click.yahoo.com/Lj3uPC/Me7FAA/CNxFAA/GSaulB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/