From pnewton@gmx.de Wed May 28 02:33:56 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 28 May 2003 02:34:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from postman1.arcor-online.net ([151.189.0.187] helo=postman.arcor.de) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19KxH2-0003wM-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 28 May 2003 02:31:08 -0700 Received: from hamwpne1 (pc1-oxfd1-5-cust27.oxfd.cable.ntl.com [62.254.134.27]) (authenticated bits=0) by postman.arcor.de (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h4S9V1Q1000081 for ; Wed, 28 May 2003 11:31:04 +0200 (MEST) From: "Philip Newton" Organization: datenrevision GmbH & Co. OHG To: lojban-list@lojban.org Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 11:30:17 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [lojban] Re: le mulno lerfu jufra Message-ID: <3ED49DC9.8544.7BC8BA@localhost> Priority: normal In-reply-to: X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v4.02a) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-description: Mail message body X-archive-position: 5476 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: pnewton@gmx.de Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list de'i li 2003:5:27 ti'u li 18:28 la sanxiyn. cu cusku di'e > lu le fagri ne'i le bidju patxu ka'e cizysmu li vore li'u > cu mulno lerfu jufra bau la lojban. On an unrelated note, you've used {bau la lojban.} for this, and also in a recent post where you remarked (paraphrasing) that {zo mroji'e cu valsi bau la lojban.}. Both {valsi} and {jufra} have a place for the language, so you could have stated that {zo mroji'e cu valsi fi la lojban.} and {lu li'o li'u cu mulno lerfu jufra fi la lojban.} I'm not sure whether you were aware of that or whether you used {bau} for stylistic reasons. mu'o mi'e .filip. -- filip.niutyn.