From lojban-out@lojban.org Thu May 15 10:42:34 2003 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_6_6); 15 May 2003 17:42:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 83475 invoked from network); 15 May 2003 17:39:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m8.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 15 May 2003 17:39:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 15 May 2003 17:39:37 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12) id 19GMhd-0003re-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Thu, 15 May 2003 10:39:37 -0700 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19GMhO-0003qp-00; Thu, 15 May 2003 10:39:22 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 15 May 2003 10:39:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rlpowell by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12) id 19GMh1-0003q3-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 15 May 2003 10:38:59 -0700 Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 10:38:59 -0700 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: Alternative Orthography. Yes, another one. Message-ID: <20030515173859.GB3216@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <20030514214459.GI3216@digitalkingdom.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i X-archive-position: 5282 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell From: Robin Lee Powell Reply-To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 19762 On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 12:17:08PM +0200, Arnt Richard Johansen wrote: > First of all: write whichever way you want, but I won't be happy > about any *official* change of the language, unless it brings vast > improvements. Of course. > Your proposal, as it appears, does not. I think dropping 20-something unnecessary symbols is good, but I wasn't pushing for an official change. -Robin -- Me: http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** I'm a *male* Robin. "but I'm not stupid and people are not stupid who think samely with me" -- from an actual, real, non-spam mail sent to webmaster@lojban.org http://www.lojban.org/ *** .i cimo'o prali .ui