From lojban-out@lojban.org Tue May 06 19:01:24 2003 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_6_6); 7 May 2003 02:01:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 89863 invoked from network); 7 May 2003 02:01:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m6.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 7 May 2003 02:01:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 7 May 2003 02:01:13 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12) id 19DEF7-0007px-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Tue, 06 May 2003 19:01:13 -0700 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19DEEW-0007pb-00; Tue, 06 May 2003 19:00:37 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 06 May 2003 19:00:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from miranda.org ([209.58.150.153] ident=qmailr) by digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 19DEEL-0007pS-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 06 May 2003 19:00:26 -0700 Received: (qmail 29100 invoked by uid 534); 7 May 2003 02:00:17 -0000 Date: Tue, 6 May 2003 20:00:17 -0600 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: Some ideas/questions (long) Message-ID: <20030507020017.GS15743@miranda.org> References: <20030507013859.GQ15743@miranda.org> <20030506214650.L90081-100000@granite.thestonecutters.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030506214650.L90081-100000@granite.thestonecutters.net> Accept-Language: art-lojban, en User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i X-archive-position: 5177 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jkominek@miranda.org Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list X-eGroups-From: Jay F Kominek From: Jay F Kominek Reply-To: jkominek@miranda.org X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 19657 On Tue, May 06, 2003 at 09:48:41PM -0400, Invent Yourself wrote: > > I will vote against anything which tries to shrink the gismu to some sort > > of minimal set. > > You say this as if any significant number might disagree with you. I don't see any reason not to state the obvious, especially when it apparently isn't obvious to these people who continue to act as though discussing this is productive. Thanks for prolonging it. -- Jay Kominek The wheels are spinning, but the hamster is dead.