From jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Fri May 23 20:00:52 2003 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 17818 invoked from network); 24 May 2003 03:00:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m13.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 24 May 2003 03:00:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 24 May 2003 03:00:51 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12) id 19JPH9-0004kp-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Fri, 23 May 2003 20:00:51 -0700 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19JPH2-0004kV-00; Fri, 23 May 2003 20:00:44 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 23 May 2003 20:00:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from web41901.mail.yahoo.com ([66.218.93.152]) by digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 19JPGt-0004kL-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 23 May 2003 20:00:35 -0700 Message-ID: <20030524002330.59303.qmail@web41901.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [200.69.5.238] by web41901.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 23 May 2003 17:23:30 PDT Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 17:23:30 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [lojban] Re: emotions To: lojban-list@lojban.org In-Reply-To: <5.2.0.9.0.20030523180338.036497d0@pop.east.cox.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-archive-position: 5369 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list From: Jorge "Llambías" Reply-To: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=142311107 X-Yahoo-Profile: jjllambias2000 X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 19849 la lojbab cusku di'e > BTW, the inclusion of such things in jvovlaste means that I for one have no > particular interest in using the thing. That would be your loss, as that is where we are concentrating all definitions of lujvo. Also, notice that experimental gismu and cmavo have their own separate sections, so you can use it without ever seeing the parts you don't like. > It cannot be a standard for the > language until the byfy decides to weed out the garbage. There is a voting procedure already in place to do the weeding out. We just need more people to actually use it, write some definitions and/or do some voting. mu'o mi'e xorxes __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. http://search.yahoo.com