From phma@webjockey.net Mon May 26 10:11:25 2003
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (qmail 31142 invoked from network); 26 May 2003 17:11:25 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218)
  by m7.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 26 May 2003 17:11:25 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175)
  by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 26 May 2003 17:11:25 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12)
	id 19KLVM-0007ay-00
	for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Mon, 26 May 2003 10:11:24 -0700
Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain)
	by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
	id 19KLVH-0007aa-00; Mon, 26 May 2003 10:11:19 -0700
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 26 May 2003 10:11:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 208-150-110-21-adsl.precisionet.net ([208.150.110.21] helo=blackcat.ixazon.lan)
	by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
	id 19KLV8-0007aQ-00
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 26 May 2003 10:11:11 -0700
Received: by blackcat.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id 61CF344A7; Mon, 26 May 2003 17:10:40 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: dis
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: Parasite
Date: Mon, 26 May 2003 13:10:39 -0400
User-Agent: KMail/1.5
References: <20030526125302.Y7019-100000@granite.thestonecutters.net>
In-Reply-To: <20030526125302.Y7019-100000@granite.thestonecutters.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200305261310.39377.phma@webjockey.net>
X-archive-position: 5417
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: phma@webjockey.net
Precedence: bulk
X-list: lojban-list
From: Pierre Abbat <phma@webjockey.net>
Reply-To: phma@webjockey.net
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=92712300
X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 19897

On Monday 26 May 2003 12:59, Invent Yourself wrote:
li'o
> I don't know what a "butineur" is, but you're probably referring to
> metaphors, which naturally, as a fine upstanding Lojbanist, you regard as
> Satanic. Regardless, tcuji'e hardly falls into that picturesque category;
> it is about as straightforward a rendering as can be imagined.

I think {ji'etcu} is better than {tcuji'e} for "x1 is parasitic on x2" since 
that fits {nitcu}'s place structure better.

phma

-- 
.i toljundi do .ibabo mi'afra tu'a do
.ibabo damba do .ibabo do jinga
.icu'u la ma'atman.