From lojban-out@lojban.org Wed May 28 02:35:58 2003 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 22281 invoked from network); 28 May 2003 09:35:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 28 May 2003 09:35:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 28 May 2003 09:35:55 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12) id 19KxLe-0006G4-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Wed, 28 May 2003 02:35:54 -0700 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19KxK5-0005ap-00; Wed, 28 May 2003 02:34:17 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 28 May 2003 02:34:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from postman1.arcor-online.net ([151.189.0.187] helo=postman.arcor.de) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19KxH2-0003wM-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 28 May 2003 02:31:08 -0700 Received: from hamwpne1 (pc1-oxfd1-5-cust27.oxfd.cable.ntl.com [62.254.134.27]) (authenticated bits=0) by postman.arcor.de (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h4S9V1Q1000081 for ; Wed, 28 May 2003 11:31:04 +0200 (MEST) Organization: datenrevision GmbH & Co. OHG To: lojban-list@lojban.org Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 11:30:17 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: [lojban] Re: le mulno lerfu jufra Message-ID: <3ED49DC9.8544.7BC8BA@localhost> Priority: normal In-reply-to: X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v4.02a) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-description: Mail message body X-archive-position: 5476 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: pnewton@gmx.de Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list X-eGroups-From: "Philip Newton" From: "Philip Newton" Reply-To: pnewton@gmx.de X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 19957 de'i li 2003:5:27 ti'u li 18:28 la sanxiyn. cu cusku di'e > lu le fagri ne'i le bidju patxu ka'e cizysmu li vore li'u > cu mulno lerfu jufra bau la lojban. On an unrelated note, you've used {bau la lojban.} for this, and also in a recent post where you remarked (paraphrasing) that {zo mroji'e cu valsi bau la lojban.}. Both {valsi} and {jufra} have a place for the language, so you could have stated that {zo mroji'e cu valsi fi la lojban.} and {lu li'o li'u cu mulno lerfu jufra fi la lojban.} I'm not sure whether you were aware of that or whether you used {bau} for stylistic reasons. mu'o mi'e .filip. -- filip.niutyn.