From tk1@despammed.com Thu May 29 08:59:02 2003 Return-Path: X-Sender: tk1@despammed.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 36255 invoked from network); 29 May 2003 15:59:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m6.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 29 May 2003 15:59:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (203.125.34.145) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 29 May 2003 15:59:01 -0000 Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 501) id 8012322882; Fri, 30 May 2003 00:02:19 +0800 (SGT) Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 00:02:19 +0800 To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: Beginner's take on the open/closed gismu debate (was: Re: emotions) Message-ID: <20030529160219.GB1204@panda.localdomain> References: <1054200714.311.79293.m12@yahoogroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1054200714.311.79293.m12@yahoogroups.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Return-Receipt-To: c1tk@c1tk.cjb.net From: tk1@despammed.com X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=134553381 X-Yahoo-Profile: c1tk X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 19986 Hello all, [Jorge Llamb?as:] > > I am thinking of replacing the last two words with e.g. "solji skapi"... > > which still leaves two syllables for random interjections. > But it won't rhyme with rebla... I saw that too, but I thought, interjections can come at the end too... :) > {ro da go nanmu gi remna gi'e nakni} is exactly the same as both > of the lojbo-ified versions of the formula so far. żoiro'e le narselci'a sumti crane cu na rinju xu? Also, actually I introduced the y and z variables in the predicate logic because you earlier pointed out that {nakni} has three role places. Thanks, -- GPG:f75949318a026c5707ff188b438cca87faf73a82 http://angelfire.com/folk/sm0p/ GCS/MU d- s: a- C++() UL P++(+++) L++(+++) E- W++ N(+) o K? w--- O? M? V? PS(+) PE Y+ PGP+ t? 5? X- R- tv-() b+ DI(+) D+ G e++ h-- !r>+++ !y