From jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Thu May 29 09:41:04 2003 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 99161 invoked from network); 29 May 2003 16:41:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 29 May 2003 16:41:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 29 May 2003 16:41:03 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12) id 19LQSd-0000HQ-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Thu, 29 May 2003 09:41:03 -0700 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19LQST-0000Gh-00; Thu, 29 May 2003 09:40:53 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 29 May 2003 09:40:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from web41905.mail.yahoo.com ([66.218.93.156]) by digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 19LQSC-0000EG-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 29 May 2003 09:40:36 -0700 Message-ID: <20030529164005.15955.qmail@web41905.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [200.49.74.2] by web41905.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 29 May 2003 09:40:05 PDT Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 09:40:05 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [lojban] Re: Beginner's take on the open/closed gismu debate (was: Re: emotions) To: lojban-list@lojban.org In-Reply-To: <20030529160219.GB1204@panda.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-archive-position: 5507 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list From: Jorge "Llambías" Reply-To: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=142311107 X-Yahoo-Profile: jjllambias2000 X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 19988 --- tk1@despammed.com wrote: > Hello all, > > [Jorge Llamb?as:] > > > > I am thinking of replacing the last two words with e.g. "solji skapi"... > > > which still leaves two syllables for random interjections. > > But it won't rhyme with rebla... > > I saw that too, but I thought, interjections can come at the end too... :) But there are no interjections ending in -ebla... :( > > {ro da go nanmu gi remna gi'e nakni} is exactly the same as both > > of the lojbo-ified versions of the formula so far. > > ¿oiro'e le narselci'a sumti crane cu na rinju xu? > > Also, actually I introduced the y and z variables in the predicate logic > because you earlier pointed out that {nakni} has three role places. The go-gi-gi'e version is Jordan's, not mine. It all depends on how precise you want to be. Without the explicit variables it is not strictly equivalent to the logical notation formula, but it still does serve as a definition. mu'o mi'e xorxes __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. http://search.yahoo.com