From arosta@uclan.ac.uk Thu May 15 05:16:52 2003 Return-Path: X-Sender: arosta@uclan.ac.uk X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (EGP: mail-8_2_6_6); 15 May 2003 12:16:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 68487 invoked from network); 15 May 2003 12:16:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 15 May 2003 12:16:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO com1.uclan.ac.uk) (193.61.255.3) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 15 May 2003 12:16:51 -0000 Received: from gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk by com1.uclan.ac.uk with SMTP (Mailer); Thu, 15 May 2003 12:38:23 +0100 Received: from DI1-Message_Server by gwise-gw1.uclan.ac.uk with Novell_GroupWise; Thu, 15 May 2003 13:18:16 +0100 Message-Id: X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 5.5.2 Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 13:18:05 +0100 To: cowan , opoudjis Cc: lojban Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Alternative Orthography. Yes, another one. Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline From: And Rosta X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=810630 X-Yahoo-Profile: andjamin X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 19755 > Should any BPFK-sponsored publication (such as a supplement to CLL)=20 > mention Latin-based alt orthographies? Or the other ones? My=20 > suspicion is no; anyone have strong feelings on the subject? pe'i BPFK should put forward the motion that any orthography that corresponds unambiguously to the official one should be deemed to fall within prescription-conformant usage. Many people have strong feelings about the official orthography -- some people loathe it, others loathe any deviation from it. I think that these sorts of battles should be negotiated through usage. --And.