From gregory.dyke@epfl.ch Thu Jun 05 01:07:56 2003
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 05 Jun 2003 01:07:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail0.epfl.ch ([128.178.50.57])
	by digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.12)
	id 19Npmn-0007Sy-00
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 05 Jun 2003 01:07:49 -0700
Received: (qmail 20222 invoked from network); 5 Jun 2003 08:07:37 -0000
Received: from sicdec1.epfl.ch (128.178.50.33)
  by mail0.epfl.ch with SMTP; 5 Jun 2003 08:07:37 -0000
Received: (from apache@localhost)
	by sicdec1.epfl.ch (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h5587aN14860
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 5 Jun 2003 10:07:36 +0200
Received: from eespapc8.epfl.ch (eespapc8.epfl.ch [128.178.58.41]) 
	by imapwww.epfl.ch (IMP) with HTTP 
	for <dyke@imap.epfl.ch>; Thu,  5 Jun 2003 10:07:36 +0200
Message-ID: <1054800456.3edefa4835f86@imapwww.epfl.ch>
X-Imap-User: gregory.dyke@epfl.ch
Date: Thu,  5 Jun 2003 10:07:36 +0200
From: gregory.dyke@epfl.ch
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: [Please Read!] Multilingual lojban.org!
References: <20030603193332.GE12377@digitalkingdom.org> <3EDDD0C3.21278.A97DFA1@localhost> <20030604182318.GP12377@digitalkingdom.org>
In-Reply-To: <20030604182318.GP12377@digitalkingdom.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.1
X-Originating-IP: 128.178.58.41
X-archive-position: 5606
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: gregory.dyke@epfl.ch
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list

> > Is there a preference for polite ("Sie/vous/usted") or informal
> > ("du/tu/t?") in the translation of those pages?
> > 
> > I'm guessing that a polite form is preferred in languages which
> > make a difference.

I chose the informal, as the only place required was the translation of e'osai 
ko sarji la lojban. It is noteworthy that on my page, I chose the formal: 
http://ic.epfl.ch/~dyke

mu'o