From sentto-44114-20191-1055941151-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Wed Jun 18 05:59:51 2003 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 18 Jun 2003 05:59:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from n11.grp.scd.yahoo.com ([66.218.66.66]) by digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 19ScXP-0003Mx-01 for lojban-in@lojban.org; Wed, 18 Jun 2003 05:59:44 -0700 X-eGroups-Return: sentto-44114-20191-1055941151-lojban-in=lojban.org@returns.groups.yahoo.com Received: from [66.218.67.195] by n11.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 18 Jun 2003 12:59:12 -0000 X-Sender: ragnarok@pobox.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 18775 invoked from network); 18 Jun 2003 12:59:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 18 Jun 2003 12:59:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp.intrex.net) (209.42.192.250) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 18 Jun 2003 12:59:10 -0000 Received: from craig [209.42.200.60] by smtp.intrex.net (SMTPD32-7.13) id A21CEAA0276; Wed, 18 Jun 2003 08:59:08 -0400 To: Message-ID: X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 In-Reply-To: <20030618112240.GD2095@ccil.org> Importance: Normal X-Declude-Sender: ragnarok@pobox.com [209.42.200.60] From: "Craig" X-Yahoo-Profile: kreig_daniyl MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: list lojban@yahoogroups.com; contact lojban-owner@yahoogroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list lojban@yahoogroups.com Precedence: bulk Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 08:59:18 -0400 Subject: [lojban] Re: mumym problem Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-archive-position: 5688 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: ragnarok@pobox.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list >I am *not* saying that you should enforce these constraints, just that >that's what is required for a valid gismu form. Personally, I would let >people guess any old @#$*. Why not, it's their guess they are wasting. >It's the programmer's choice. Except that you can get more information by making up "any old @#$*" than by constraining yourself to real words. This would make the game far too easy, in my opinion. -- mi'e kreig daniyl "kickball, not quantum mechanics. That was okay in grade school." -clsn ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~--> Get A Free Psychic Reading! Your Online Answer To Life's Important Questions. http://us.click.yahoo.com/Lj3uPC/Me7FAA/ySSFAA/GSaulB/TM ---------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/