From jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Wed Jun 04 16:21:13 2003 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 46266 invoked from network); 4 Jun 2003 23:21:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m10.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 4 Jun 2003 23:21:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 4 Jun 2003 23:21:13 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12) id 19NhZA-0005Ti-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Wed, 04 Jun 2003 16:21:12 -0700 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19NhZ0-0005T3-00; Wed, 04 Jun 2003 16:21:02 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 04 Jun 2003 16:21:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from web41903.mail.yahoo.com ([66.218.93.154]) by digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 19NhYn-0005Sp-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 04 Jun 2003 16:20:49 -0700 Message-ID: <20030604152159.80634.qmail@web41903.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [200.49.74.2] by web41903.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 04 Jun 2003 08:21:59 PDT Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 08:21:59 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [lojban] Re: I saw three kinds of dogs To: lojban-list@lojban.org In-Reply-To: <20030604105417.I53568-100000@granite.thestonecutters.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-archive-position: 5603 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list From: Jorge "Llambías" Reply-To: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=142311107 X-Yahoo-Profile: jjllambias2000 X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 20085 la xod cusku di'e > For most people, there can be any number of stereotypical dogs, and each > one they refer to as le'e gerku. If you say so. I don't see {le'e} being used at all. > For you, le'e gerku is the stereotype > itself, of which there can only be one. (Let's not get distracted with the > boundary cases.) I'm not sure why you say that. For a given da poi se gerku, there will be only one lo'e gerku be da, but for de poi na du da, there will be another lo'e gerku be de. The difference between {lo'e} and {le'e} is that with {le'e} I'm talking of certain three kinds of dogs that I have in mind. mu'o mi'e xorxes __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. http://search.yahoo.com