From jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Tue Jun 03 21:19:24 2003 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 28132 invoked from network); 4 Jun 2003 04:19:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 4 Jun 2003 04:19:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitalkingdom.org) (204.152.186.175) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 4 Jun 2003 04:19:23 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.12) id 19NPkB-0006xj-00 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Tue, 03 Jun 2003 21:19:23 -0700 Received: from digitalkingdom.org ([204.152.186.175] helo=chain) by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19NPk1-0006xO-00; Tue, 03 Jun 2003 21:19:13 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 03 Jun 2003 21:19:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from web41903.mail.yahoo.com ([66.218.93.154]) by digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 19NPjs-0006xF-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 03 Jun 2003 21:19:04 -0700 Message-ID: <20030603203013.41849.qmail@web41903.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [200.49.74.2] by web41903.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 03 Jun 2003 13:30:13 PDT Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 13:30:13 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [lojban] Re: I saw three kinds of dogs To: lojban-list@lojban.org In-Reply-To: <20030603161136.S24506-100000@granite.thestonecutters.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-archive-position: 5592 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Precedence: bulk X-list: lojban-list From: Jorge "Llambías" Reply-To: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=142311107 X-Yahoo-Profile: jjllambias2000 X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 20074 la xod cusku di'e > > {ci cnano gerku} would be "three normal dogs", if that's what > > "three stereotypical dogs" means. > > Yes, I was asking how you would have said "three stereotypical dogs", > assuming you wouldn't use le'e. I would use a brivla meaning "x1 is stereotypical in property x2". If cnano covers that, then cnano would work, if not, then a suitable lujvo or fu'ivla. I don't think that's a very frequently used concept though. (Certainly not something that would require a special gadri!) > I understand your use of le'e here, but it's based on a nonstandard > understanding of the multiplicity of stereotypes. I don't really base it on any understanding of stereotypes. mu'o mi'e xorxes __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo. http://search.yahoo.com