From araizen@newmail.net Mon Jul 21 10:11:37 2003
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 21 Jul 2003 10:11:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxout4.netvision.net.il ([194.90.9.27])
	by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
	id 19eeCA-0003hM-00
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 21 Jul 2003 10:11:30 -0700
Received: from default ([62.0.115.147]) by mxout4.netvision.net.il
 (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.14 (built Mar 18 2003))
 with SMTP id <0HID0011RX31CW@mxout4.netvision.net.il> for
 lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 21 Jul 2003 20:11:27 +0300 (IDT)
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 20:12:27 +0200
From: Adam Raizen <araizen@newmail.net>
Subject: [lojban] Re: use of ko'a
To: "lojban-list@lojban.org" <lojban-list@lojban.org>
Message-id: <0HID0011SX32CW@mxout4.netvision.net.il>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Foxmail 4.1 [eg]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-archive-position: 5939
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: araizen@newmail.net
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list

de'i li 2003-07-21 ti'u li 17:01:00 la'o zoi. And Rosta .zoi cusku di'e

>{zo'e} generalizes over all sumti, including quantified variables and zi'o;
>it is not restricted to specific referents.

Haven't we agreed that zo'e can't be zi'o? Allowing it to be zi'o would
have very significant semantic effects.

mu'o mi'e .adam.