From a.rosta@lycos.co.uk Mon Jul 21 15:10:09 2003
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 21 Jul 2003 15:10:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lmsmtp01.st1.spray.net ([212.78.202.111])
	by digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.12)
	id 19eiqy-0008BE-00
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 21 Jul 2003 15:09:56 -0700
Received: from oemcomputer (host81-7-54-182.surfport24.v21.co.uk [81.7.54.182])
	by lmsmtp01.st1.spray.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F43C1E7A5
	for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Tue, 22 Jul 2003 00:09:24 +0200 (MEST)
Message-ID: <00c201c34fd4$c1d79ce0$55350751@oemcomputer>
From: "And Rosta" <a.rosta@lycos.co.uk>
To: <lojban-list@lojban.org>
References: <20030721124740.U72693-100000@granite.thestonecutters.net>
Subject: [lojban] Re: le du (was: use of ko'a)
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 23:09:25 +0100
Organization: Livagian Consulate
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
X-archive-position: 5944
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: a.rosta@lycos.co.uk
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list

xod:
> On Mon, 21 Jul 2003, And Rosta wrote:
>
> > {le du} is a perfectly acceptable translation of "they". The question
is:
> > is unbound ko'a meaningless, or is it equivalent to {le du}.
>
> How do you use le du?

As a specific reference without any identificatory description -- much like
English "them".

==And.